Developing a Mixed Methods Research Approach through Iterative Research on Archival Exhibitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33700/2670-4579.36.2.93-117(2026)Keywords:
mixed methods research, iterative research design, archival exhibitions, visitor experienceAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to present the development of a research approach for studying archival exhibitions from two connected perspectives: those of exhibition authors and those of adult visitors to archival exhibitions. The approach was developed to examine the relationship between authors’ intentions and visitors’ experiences.
Method/approach: The research follows an iterative approach in which findings and methodological considerations from each stage inform decisions in the following stages. This process allows the research design to evolve as the study progresses and enables quantitative and qualitative methods to be combined in response to the research problem.
Results: The resulting mixed methods approach applies both quantitative and qualitative methods to the perspectives of exhibition authors and visitors. The quantitative component allows the two groups to be compared across a larger sample, while the qualitative component examines authors and visitors of the same exhibitions in greater depth and within the specific context of each exhibition. The integration of the two components makes it possible to compare authors’ intended visitor experiences with visitors’ reported experiences and provides a more comprehensive basis for answering the research question than either approach alone.
Conclusions/findings: The development of the research design shows the potential of an iterative mixed methods approach for empirical research in archival science. Although the approach can only be fully evaluated after all phases of the research have been completed, it may also be useful for studying archival topics beyond exhibitions.
Downloads
References
Ambrož, M. (2023). Metodologija raziskovanja v družboslovju: Pragmatični pristop k raziskovanju v družbenih vedah. Maribor: Alma Mater Europaea – Evropski Center Maribor, Alma Mater Press.
Braun, J. (2017). Now on display: Lessons learned from building a small exhibits program. Archival Issues, 38(2), 6–19. Retrieved at https://kb.osu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/08b5017f-af1e-4f42-b3fa-14b0d4ac279a/content (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Busetto, L., Wick, W. and Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, 14. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Commission of the European Communities. (2000). A memorandum on lifelong learning (Commission Staff Working Paper, SEC(2000) 1832). Retrieved at https://www.uil.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2023/05/european-communities-a-memorandum-on-lifelong-learning.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Gerchikova, N. A., Degtyareva, I. A., Lovtsov, A. S., Meltyukhov, M. I., Sabennikova, I. V. and Tkachenko, N. A. (2024). Methodological recommendations for exhibiting archival documents: Features of preparation, characteristics of structure and content. Vestnik VNIIDAD (Herald of VNIIDAD), 1, 40–49. Retrieved at https://journals.rcsi.science/2619-1601/article/view/267004/245945 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
GEM (Group for Education in Museums). (2026). Generic Learning Outcomes Framework 2026. GEM. Retrieved at https://gem.org.uk/resource/generic-learning-outcomes-framework-2025/ (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Gfrereis, H. (2016). Ausstellung. In M. Lepper and U. Raulff (eds.), Handbuch Archiv: Geschichte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven (pp. 225–236). Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler Verlag GmbH.
Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Horvat, M. (2024). Učinek čustev na pripravo in percepcijo arhivskih razstav. Moderna arhivistika, 7(1), 83–95. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.54356/ma/2024/laty9297 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Howgill, E. (2015). New methods of analysing archival exhibitions. Archives and Records, 36(2), 179–194. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2015.1052784 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Kim, Y.-J. (2009). Archives and museum exhibitions compared: With the emphasis on the exhibitions held in memory of the 60th anniversary of national foundation. Korean Journal of Records Management, 9(2), 104–131. Retrieved at https://accesson.kr/jksarm/v.9/2/103/1165 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Klasinc, P. P. (2011). Študij arhivistike kot znanstvene vede. Tehnični in vsebinski problemi klasičnega in elektronskega arhiviranja, 10(2011), 73–81. Maribor: Pokrajinski arhiv Maribor. Retrieved at https://www.pokarh-mb.si/uploaded/datoteke/Radenci/radenci2011/08_klasinc_2011.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Lester, P. (2022). Exhibiting the archive: Space, encounter, and experience. New York: Routledge.
Lutz, A. (2003). Vom „bloßen Geklapper“ zur „zwingenden Notwendigkeit“? Eine Untersuchung zu den Formen und dem Stellenwert der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit in Staatsarchiven fünf verschiedener Bundesländer und dem Bundesarchiv am Standort Koblenz. Transferarbeit im Rahmen der Ausbildung für den Höheren Archivdienst, Archivschule Marburg. Retrieved at https://www.landesarchiv-bw.de/sixcms/media.php/120/Transferarbeit2003_Lutz.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Mesec, B. (1998). Uvod v kvalitativno raziskovanje v socialnem delu. Ljubljana: Visoka šola za socialno delo. Retrieved at https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-C11L6WB5/92248721-1c57-48ab-8705-5504e2d439bb/PDF (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Mesec, B. (2023). Kvalitativno raziskovanje v teoriji in praksi. Ljubljana: Inštitut za razvojne in strateške analize. Retrieved at https://institut-irsa.si/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Blaz-Mesec_Kvalitativno-raiskovanje-v-teoriji-in-praksi_2023.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2026).
McCombes, S. (2019). Sampling methods: Types, techniques & examples. Scribbr. Retrieved at https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/sampling-methods/ (accessed on 25 August 2026).
McCombie, C., Miguel Esponda, G., Schmidt, U. and Lawrence, V. (2024). Qualitative diary methods in mental health research: A scoping review and recommendations for research and reporting. European Psychologist, 29(1), 3–16. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000511 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). What is non-probability sampling? Types & examples. Scribbr. Retrieved at https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/non-probability-sampling/. (accessed on 21 August 2025).
Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42, 15–29. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Othman, M. K., Petrie, H. and Power, C. (2011). Engaging visitors in museums with technology: Scales for the measurement of visitor and multimedia guide experience. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque and M. Winckler (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 6949, pp. 92–99). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_8 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2002). Motivational factors and the visitor experience: A comparison of three sites. Curator: The Museum Journal, 45(3), 183–198. Retrieved at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227663047_Motivational_Factors_and_the_Visitor_Experience_A_Comparison_of_Three_Sites (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Pekarik, A. J., Doering, Z. D. and Karns, D. A. (1999). Exploring satisfying experiences in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 42(2), 152–173. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1999.tb01137.x (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Potočnik, D. (2004). Arhiv kot vir za poučevanje zgodovine. Pedagoška obzorja = Didactica Slovenica: Časopis za didaktiko in metodiko, 19(1), 121–127. Retrieved at https://www.dlib.si/listalnik/URN_NBN_SI_doc-FDRYHJFJ/60/index.html (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Roblek, V. (2009). Primer izpeljave analize besedila v kvalitativni raziskavi. Management, 4(1), 53–69. Retrieved at http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1854-4231/4_053-069.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Salomão, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviews in qualitative research. Mind the Graph. Retrieved at https://mindthegraph.com/blog/semi-structured-interviews-in-qualitative-research/ (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H. and Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Saurombe, N. (2020). Taking archives to the people: An examination of public programs in the National Archives of the Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Branch of the International Council on Archives. Archives and Manuscripts, 48(1), 25–44. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1604242 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Srivastava, P. and Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Thoma, G.-B. (2009). Was lernen Besucherinnen und Besucher im Museum? Eine Untersuchung von Lerngelegenheiten einer Museumsausstellung und ihrer Nutzung [Doctoral dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel]. Retrieved at https://d-nb.info/1019870311/34 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. and Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
Valadžija, Š. (2024). Razstava kot medij za predstavitev arhivskega gradiva. Moderna arhivistika, 7(2), 128–143. Retrieved at https://doi.org/10.54356/ma/2024/ibvj8527 (accessed on 25 August 2026).
