ORAL HISTORY AND COLLECTIVE MEMORY: DOCUMENTING REFUGEE VOICES AND THE CHALLENGES OF ARCHIVAL REPRESENTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33700/2670-4579.29.2.%25p(2019)Keywords:
Refugees, collective memory, cultural heritage, oral history, representationAbstract
This paper will explore the concept of preserving refugee rights in the records that we keep, and will explore how we have undertaken civic engagement and outreach work with refugees and asylum seekers in London and beyond to explore ways of documenting their stories through the us of bottom-up oral history methodologies and the use of objectives and textiles as a means of preserving collective memories and a new modes of representation beyond the traditional written word. It will also consider the role of ethics and the role of archives in documenting under-represented communities.
The Refugee Council Archive at UEL is a growing collection of archival materials documenting the refugee experience. This paper will reflect on our work exploring the very nature of what we mean by the concept of an “archive,” and explore the challenges of bottom-up methodological approaches for helping to preserve the collective memory of refugees, migrants and asylum seekers in way that enables their voices to be heard in a positive way and is documentation along the best methodology to achieve this.
Downloads
References
Brewis, G. (2017). Filling in the blanks: Why charities must take records management seriously, Voluntary Sector Archives. Available at: http://www.voluntarysectorarchives. org.uk/archives/1079 (Accessed: 31 March 2019).
Dudman, P. V. (2019a). ‘Contested Histories, Intangible Heritage: Human Rights and The German Occupation Memorial and Eleven Emlekmű (Eleven Memorial) in Budapest, Hungary’, Citizens Voices, 12, pp. 24–29.
Dudman, P. V. (2019b). ‘#volsecarchives: Human rights in records and the Campaign for Voluntary Sector Archives’, Citizens Voices, pp. 20–27.
Erőss, Á. (2016). “In memory of victims”: Monument and counter-monument in Liberty Square, Budapest’, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 65(3), pp. 237–254. doi: 10.15201/hungeobull.65.3.3.
Eshet, D. and Agosín, M. (2008). Stitching truth: women’s protest art in Pinochet’s Chile. Brookline, Mass: Facing History and Ourselves (The making history series).
Hashem, R. (2014). Empirical Research on Gender and Armed Conflict: Applying Narratology, Intersectionality and Anti-Oppressive Methods. London: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/978144627305013520913.
Hashem, R. and Dudman, P. V. (2016). ‘Paradoxical narratives of transcultural encounters of the “other”: Civic engagement with refugees and migrants in London’, Transnational Social Review, 6(1–2), pp. 192–199. doi: 10.1080/21931674.2016.1186376.
Irfan, A. (2016). ‘Over-researched, under-represented: The case of the Palestinian refugee camps’.
Kershaw, N. and Pearsall, M. (2009). Immigrants and Aliens: A Guide to Sources on UK Immigration and Citizenship. Kew, Richmond: The National Archives. Available at: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Immigrants-Aliens-Sources-Immigration-Citizenship/ dp/1903365627/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=immigrants+and+aliens+kershaw&- qid=1562966219&s=gateway&sr=8-3 (Accessed: 12 July 2019).
Marfleet, P. (2007). ‘Refugees and history: why we must address the past’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 26, pp. 136–148.
Ozkul, D. (2019). ‘Discussion statement’. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Rupčić, T. (2018). ‘Problem of Private Archives in the Republic of Serbia’, Atlanti, 28(1), pp. 217–220. doi: 10.33700/2670-451X.28.1.217-220(2018).
Schwartz, J. M. and Cook, T. (2002). ‘Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory’, Archival Science, 2(1–2), pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1007/BF02435628.
Stevens, M. (2009). Migration and identity in the UK heritage sector. London [England: London, p. 43. Available at: https://baringfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ 2014/09/Stories.pdf (Accessed: 14 July 2019).
Sunga, R. (2019). ‘Creative methods of dissemination in forced migration research: Emerging Scholars and Practitioners on Forced Migration Issues’.
