Compliments as Speech Acts: To Whom or What Are They Given?

Authors

  • Tadej Praprotnik Faculty of Humanities, University of Primorska, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33700/1580-7118.17.2.97-131(2015)

Keywords:

communication, speech acts, politeness, compliments, gender

Abstract

The article presents various aspects and dimensions of interpersonal communication as a field where interpersonal relationships are established. Special focus is directed toward the interactional and ritual character of speech acts, which are processed and embedded in speech as a form of social practice. An utterance is not only a matter of talking, but of acting too. By saying something we also perform a specific set of actions, which largely depend on the broader interpersonal circumstances within which the interaction occurs, as well as on the identities and social roles attributed to the interlocutors. Each instance of communication is part of a larger social situation, so the motivations behind the performance of individual speech acts vary widely. This article presents compliments as specific speech acts aiming to satisfy various sets of intentions. Affective and instrumental talk are highlighted as two different sets of language function, of which the former is oriented toward expressing emotion and maintaining social relations, while the latter is concerned with conveying information and facts. This distinction is the basis for further elaboration of compliments as speech acts conveying a positive appreciation of an action or person. Compliments are closely interconnected with maintaining the face (and positive emotions) of the other. The article also investigates the gender-motivated distinctions among the various versions and types of compliments, which serve as a kind of verbal gift.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AUSTIN, J. L. (1990): Kako napravimo kaj z besedami, Ljubljana, Studia humanitatis.

BERGER, J. (1972): Ways of seeing, London and Harmondsworth, British Broadcasting Corporation, Penguin Books.

BLUM-KULKA, S. (1997): “Discourse Pragmatics”, v: Van Dijk, Teun, ur., Discourse as Social Interaction, Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Volume 2, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 38–63.

BROWN, P., LEVINSON, S. C. (1999): “Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage”, v: Jaworski, A., Coupland, N., ur., The Discourse Reader, Routledge, London in New York, 321–335.

BUCHOLTZ, M., HALL, K. (2003): “Language and Identity”, v: Duranti, A., ur., A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 368–394. http://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/faculty/ kira_hall/articles/B&H2004b.pdf, 9. 5. 2015.

DOWNES, W. (1998): Language and Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

ECKERT, P. In McCONNELL-GINET, S. (2003): Language and Gender, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

GRICE, P. H. (1999), “Logic and Conversation”, v: Jaworski, A., Coupland, N., ur., The Discourse Reader, Routledge, London in New York, 76–88.

HERBERT, R. K. (1990): “Sex-based differences in compliment behavior”, Language in Society, 19(2), 201–224.

KOTNIK, V. (2014): “Misliti intervju: k epistemologiji neke intersubjektivne terenske metode (1. del)”, Monitor ISH, XVI/2, 7–44.

PRAPROTNIK, T. (2009): “Identiteta in performativnost”, Monitor ISH, XI/1, 55–70.

PRAPROTNIK, T. (2012): “Procesi osmišljanja sveta in konstrukcija identitete”, Monitor ISH, XIV/1, 75–115.

PRAPROTNIK, T. (2013): “Medijska konstrukcija realnosti: rituali, diskurzi in inštitucije”, Monitor ISH, XV/1, 119–179.

PRAPROTNIK, T. (2014): “Identiteta v medgeneracijskem komuniciranju”, Monitor ISH, XVI/2, 69–100.

RYAN, E. B. (2007): “Aging, Identity, Attitudes, and Intergenerational Communication”, v: Harwood, J., ur., Understanding Communication and Aging; Developing Knowledge and Awareness, SAGE PUBLICATIONS, University of Arizona, 73–91, http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/15091_Chapter4.pdf, 24. 1. 2014

TANNEN, D. (1993): You just don’t understand: women and men in conversation, London, Virago Press.

TURNER, R. (1974): “Words, Utterances and Activities”, v: Ethnomethodology, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 197–215.

VERSCHUEREN, J. (2000): Razumeti pragmatiko, Ljubljana, založba Cf.

VOLOŠINOV, V. N. (2008): Marksizem in filozofija jezika; Temeljni problemi sociološke metode v znanosti o jeziku, Ljubljana, Studia humanitatis.

Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika, spletna verzija, Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša ZRC SAZU (http://bos.zrc-sazu.si/cgi/neva.exe?name=ssbsj&tch=14&expression=zs%3D27949)

Downloads

Published

2015-11-03

Issue

Section

Original scientific article

How to Cite

Compliments as Speech Acts: To Whom or What Are They Given?. (2015). Monitor ISH, 17(2), 97-131. https://doi.org/10.33700/1580-7118.17.2.97-131(2015)