The State Archive as a Treasure Trove of Memory in a Dynamic Sense
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33700/2670-451X.36.2.37-51(2026)Keywords:
cultural heritage, digitisation, State Archives, judicial archives, archival bondAbstract
Purpose: The article examines judicial archives held in the State Archives as documentary heritage of both legal-institutional and historical-archival significance. It aims to address their management within the digital transformation of justice, considering records creation, file management, preservation, digitisation of analogue records, and access as interconnected stages of a single records process.
Methods/Approach: The article adopts a conceptual and descriptive approach to judicial archives, discussing the technical and legal requirements governing records creation and preservation. Particular attention is given to the archival bond and the relationships connecting records in the archives of public institutions and private creators.
Results: Judicial archives document the activities of judicial offices, civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings, judicial decisions, and the exercise of the State’s judicial function. The archival bond is more readily apparent in public institutions subject to detailed technical and legal requirements, but it also characterises archives created by private institutions, companies, families, and individuals. These internal relationships connect records generated for the practical purposes of their creators. Access to judicial records serves research, administrative, and personal needs and is governed by internal regulations.
Discussion and conclusions: The archival bond remains a defining characteristic of every archive, regardless of the creator’s institutional status or how clearly the relationships between records are visible. The digital transformation of justice calls for an integrated approach to judicial archives that connects records creation and management with preservation, digitisation, and access while maintaining the relationships that give records their archival context.
Downloads
References
AgID – Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale. (2020a). Documentation regarding the preservation system and document management, with reference to the requirements of authenticity, integrity, reliability, readability, and retrievability.
AgID – Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale. (2020b). Guidelines on the creation, management, and preservation of electronic documents, adopted pursuant to Article 71 of the CAD. Retrieved from https://trasparenza.agid.gov.it/page/29/details/38/linee-guida-sulla-formazione-gestione-e-conservazione-dei-documenti-informatici.html (accessed on 2. 10. 2026).
Alibrandi, T., and Ferri, P. G. (1987). Cultural and environmental heritage in administrative law. In Digesto delle discipline pubblicistiche (Vol. II, p. 223). Torino.
Borgesano, F., De Maio, A., Laghi, P., and Musanno, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and justice: A systematic literature review and future research perspectives on Justice 5.0. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(11), 349–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2025-0117.
Buzzanca, A. (2019). The enhancement of private cultural heritage: Statutory profiles. Roma: ESI.
Buzzanca, A. (2023). The right to be forgotten between the right to report, the historical re-enactment of the news and the obligation to protect cultural heritage. Ambiente Diritto, 3, 154–166. Retrieved from https://www.ambientediritto.it/ (accessed on 1. 10 2026).
Cencetti, G. (1940). The archives of ancient Rome in the Republican age. Archives, 2(VII), 7–49.
Crespo, C., and Viñas, V. (1984). The preservation and restoration of paper records and books: A RAMP study with guidelines. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000063519 (accessed on 1. 10 2026).
Guercio, M. (2019). Archivistica informatica. Roma: Carocci Editore.
Ministry of Culture (MiC). (2022). Guidelines for the digitization of cultural heritage: National Plan for the Digitization of Cultural Heritage 2022–2023. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.cultura.gov.it/linee-guida/ (accessed on 1. 10. 2026).
Ministry of Culture (MiC), Central Institute for the Digitization of Cultural Heritage – Digital Library. (2023). National Plan for the Digitization (PND2023) of cultural heritage. Retrived from https://trasparenza.agid.gov.it/page/29/details/38/linee-guida-sulla-formazione-gestione-e-conservazione-dei-documenti-informatici.html (accessed on 1. 10. 2026).
Ministry of Justice. (17 December 2025). Digitization of case files of historical interest. Retrieved from https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/page/it/digitalizzazione_atti_processi_di_interesse_storico (accessed on 1. 10 .2026).
Ministry of Justice. (2026a). Digitalization reform (M1C1-R1.8): Digitalization of the justice system under the PNRR. Retrived from https://www.giustizia.it/cmsresources/cms/documents/anno_giudiziario2026_relazione_amministrazione2025.pdf (accessed on 1. 10. 2026).
Ministry of Justice. (2026b). Report for the judicial year: Digitization of judicial case files and achievement of the target.
