User-Generated Content in Archival Practice: A Case Study of Participatory Approaches at the National Archives of Hungary

Authors

  • Ildikó Szerényi Senior archivist at the National Archives of Hungary
  • András Simon IT developer at the National Archives of Hungary, Digital Services Department

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33700/2670-451X.36.1.123-140(2026)

Keywords:

Databases, Namespaces, Archival workflow, User Generated Content, Volunteers

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a case study of User-Generated Content (UGC) practices at the National Archives of Hungary, focusing on participatory approaches that actively involve citizens in archival processes.

Methodology: The study identifies and analyses three main domains of user contribution. First, it examines the role of volunteers in database construction, highlighting how civic participants contribute to the processing, transcription, and structuring of archival data. Second, it explores community-based acquisition practices, including thematic collection days and outreach initiatives through which individuals donate private documents - such as diaries and correspondence - for long-term preservation. Third, the paper investigates user contributions in the form of comments associated with digitized archival materials, through which users provide additional contextual information and assist in the identification of persons, places, and events.

Results: The paper demonstrates how these forms of engagement extend traditional archival functions by integrating lay knowledge into institutional workflows. Particular attention is paid to the impact of user contributions on metadata enrichment, accessibility, and the interpretative potential of archival records.

Conclusions/findings: The findings suggest that UGC-based practices significantly enhance the scope and depth of archival collections while fostering a more participatory and inclusive archival culture. At the same time, they raise important challenges related to data reliability, quality control, and the incorporation of user-generated inputs into professional archival standards. By outlining these three domains, the paper contributes to broader discussions on participatory archives and the evolving role of users as co-creators of cultural heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bolin, G. (2021). User-Generated Content (UGC): Understanding the Activity of Media Use in the Age of Digital Reproduction. DOI: 10.1515/9783110740202-015 (accessed on 20.9.2026).

Hedges, M., & Dunn, S. (2018). Academic crowdsourcing in the humanities: Crowds, communities and co-production. Chandos Publishing.

Longley, P. A., Hearn, L., Smith, I. (2026, January 5). Reviewing Crowdsourcing and Community Engagement in Museums, Publications, MDPI. Doi: 10.3390/publications14010006 (accessed on 20.9.2026).

Saura, J.; Palacios-Marqués, D.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2023). Privacy concerns in social media UGC communities: Understanding user behavior sentiments in complex networks. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 23, 125–145. DOI: 10.1007/s10257-023-00631-5 (accessed on 20.9.2026).

Schmidt, A, in Szabó, D. (2018). Gyűjteményes napok (Collection Days). MNL Országos Levéltárában Levéltári Szemle, 68(3). 257–264.

Terras, M. (2016). Crowdsourcing in digital humanities. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens; J. Unsworth (Eds.), New companion to digital humanities 2nd ed. (pp. 420–439). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118680596.html (accessed on 20.9.2026).

Downloads

Published

09.11.2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

User-Generated Content in Archival Practice: A Case Study of Participatory Approaches at the National Archives of Hungary. (2026). Atlanti, 36(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.33700/2670-451X.36.1.123-140(2026)