Certification and Trusted Digital Repositories: the Role of Standards and Policies

Authors

  • Maria Guercio Sapienza University of Rome

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33700/2670-451X.25.1.245-255(2015)

Keywords:

digital preservation, digital repository, certification, policy, information governance, OAIS

Abstract

The contribution discusses digital preservation issues with specific reference to the role of standards and policies relevant for digital repositories certification and auditing. The analysis will focus on the OAIS reference model and related standards at the basis of ISO 16363 and ISO 16919, their evolution in the last decade and the critical aspects still open (such as the development of accreditation bodies and the level of parameters for metrics and assessment). The role of policies for digital preservation is also examined as output from international research (InterPARES and APARSEN) and in the Italian legislation, briefly described as a case study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agid -Agenzia per l’Italia digitale (2014), Requisiti di qualità e sicurezza per l’accreditamento e la vigilanza. Available at http://www.agid.gov.it/sites/default/files/documentazione/requisiti_di_qualita_e_sicurezza_v.1.1.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

APARSEN (2012), Deliverable 33. 1b. Report on peer review of digital repositories. Available at http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/06/APARSEN-REP-D33_1B-01-1_1_incURN.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

APARSEN (2014), Deliverable 35.1. Exemplar good governance structures and data policies, Available at http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/index.php/aparsen/aparsen-research/wp35-data-policies-and-governance (accessed on 12.06.2015).

ARMA (2015), Generally accepted recordkeeping principles. Available at http://www.arma.org/r2/generallyaccepted-br-recordkeeping-principles (accessed on 12.06.2015).

CLOCKSS (2014), Clockss Audit Report. Available at http://www.crl.edu/reports/clockss-audit-report-2014 (accessed on 12.06.2015).

consultative committee for space data systems (2011), Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Magenta Book. Issue 1. September 2011. Available at Available at http://www.public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

consultative committee for space data systems (2013). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (oais). Draft Recommendation for Space Data System Standards, Washington. Available at http://www.public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

Duranti L., Thibodeau K. (2006), The concept of record in interactive, experiential and dynamic environments: the view of InterPARES. Archival Science, 6, pp. 13-68.

Guercio M. (2013), The Italian case: legal framework and good practices for digital preservation. In CULTURAL HERITAGE on line. Trusted digital repositories & trusted professionals. Firenze 11-12 December 2012. Firenze: Fondazione Rinascimento digitale. Available at http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn:nbn:it:frd-9406, http://www.rinascimento-digitale.it/conference2012/paper_ic_2012/guercio_paper.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

Guercio M. (2014), Conservare il digitale. Bari-Roma: Laterza.

InterPARES (2006), InterPARES, Creator guidelines. Making and maintaining digital materials: guidelines for individuals; Preserver guidelines. Preserving digital records: guidelines for organizations, Appendix 21. In Inter- PARES 2, International research on permanent authentic records in electronic systems 2, experiential, interactive and dynamic records, L. Duranti, Randy Preston editors, pp. 685-698 e 699-712. Available at http://www.interpares.org/ip2/display_file.cfm?doc=ip2_book_part_5_modeling_task_force.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

Logan D. (2010), What is information governance? And why is it so hard?, January 2010. Available at http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/2010/01/11/what-is-information-governance-and-why-is-it-so-hard/ (accessed on 12.06.2015).

Research Library Group-Nara Digital Repository Certification Task Force (2007), Trustworthy repositories audit and certification (TRAC): criteria and checklist. Available at http://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

Research Library Group/Oclc Working group on digital archive attributes (2002), Trusted digital repositories. Attributes and responsibilities. An RLG-OCLC Report, Mountain View, CA: RLG. Available at http://www.rlg.org/en/pdfs/repositories.pdf (accessed on 12.06.2015).

Downloads

Published

2015-10-19

How to Cite

Certification and Trusted Digital Repositories: the Role of Standards and Policies. (2015). Atlanti, 25(1), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.33700/2670-451X.25.1.245-255(2015)